Pragmatic Variation in Libyan Academic Discourse in English as a Foreign Language: A Descriptive Study Based on a Linguistic Corpus of Contextual Meaning

Authors

  • Nawal Mohamed Ayad Al-Sayeh كلية التربية- العجيلات -جامعة الزاوية Author
  • Siham Omran Ashour كلية التربية -العجيلات-جامعة الزاوية Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65405/6v3zt731

Keywords:

EFL academic discourse, pragmatic variation, contextual meaning, corpus-based study, Libyan learners

Abstract

This descriptive corpus-based study investigates how pragmatic variation appears in academic English used by Libyan English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Focusing on contextual meaning, the research examines patterns of language use that convey social and communicative functions beyond grammatical accuracy. By analysing a compiled corpus of student writing and spoken academic interactions, this study identifies frequent pragmatic features such as hedging, metadiscourse marking, and speech act variation. The findings demonstrate that Libyan EFL writers often adopt pragmatic patterns that diverge from native academic norms, reflecting influences of first language sociopragmatic frameworks and educational context. These results highlight the need for pedagogical emphasis on pragmatic competence in EFL instruction in Libya, particularly in academic settings where contextual meaning conveys disciplinary and interpersonal meaning. The research contributes to a better understanding of how context shapes meaning in EFL academic discourse and supports curriculum development geared towards communicative competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Abdulkareem, A. (2021). Sociopragmatic transfer in EFL writing: Evidence from Arabic-speaking learners. Journal of Pragmatics, 182, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.002

Al-Zahrani, S. (2020). Investigating pragmatic markers in EFL academic writing: A corpus-based study. Arab World English Journal, 11(2), 45–60. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.4

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (2021). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677910

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198845200.001.0001

Hyland, K. (2022). English for academic purposes: Research and teaching implications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003184278

Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2022). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102647

Mauranen, A. (2021). Exploring academic English: Linguistic research and applications. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.90

Taguchi, N. (2021). The pragmatics of second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 41, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719052100003X

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Pragmatic Variation in Libyan Academic Discourse in English as a Foreign Language: A Descriptive Study Based on a Linguistic Corpus of Contextual Meaning. (2026). Comprehensive Journal of Science, 10(39), 892-902. https://doi.org/10.65405/6v3zt731

Most read articles by the same author(s)